Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 09:05:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9222B8C53395E0FC9467602472B56E79932E651C00F7C435F6996A8FD83E911
Participant Details

Original Note:

I will only approve CN’s, IF it’s an outright LIE presented as fact AND which has a significant impact on the message… In this case it’s outdated info where the current info has little to no impact on the message. Whether it’s labour or ex-labour will not change the message…

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820859412866576478
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9222B8C53395E0FC9467602472B56E79932E651C00F7C435F6996A8FD83E911
  • createdAtMillis - 1723021514571
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820859412866576478E9222B8C53395E0FC9467602472B56E79932E651C00F7C435F6996A8FD83E911