Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 07:42:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6B3523447AB1C70A42F39FB1194282953E0C3E6CC16BB2F2E939888EBD41D6C7
Participant Details

Original Note:

I will only approve CN’s, IF it’s an outright LIE presented as fact AND which has a significant impact on the message… In this case it’s outdated info where the current info has little to no impact on the message. Whether it’s labour or ex-labour will not change the message…

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820859412866576478
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6B3523447AB1C70A42F39FB1194282953E0C3E6CC16BB2F2E939888EBD41D6C7
  • createdAtMillis - 1723016541678
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18208594128665764786B3523447AB1C70A42F39FB1194282953E0C3E6CC16BB2F2E939888EBD41D6C7