Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 04:14:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BEF80A1EB548833D60A328366F326D651113557E2F6432A21A2E0A1DEC832B99
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - people do understand that this is not about individual companies deciding to seize advertising, but about rating companies going after certain platforms without merit, which is illegal in antitrust terms.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820850519629279561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BEF80A1EB548833D60A328366F326D651113557E2F6432A21A2E0A1DEC832B99
  • createdAtMillis - 1723004041175
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820850519629279561BEF80A1EB548833D60A328366F326D651113557E2F6432A21A2E0A1DEC832B99