Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 17:15:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0ADFDD2D8E399354F4717FCDFD855A14CF7FDBAA5B8244B00C6AC2CD2FC9B65
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - people do understand that this is not about individual companies deciding to seize advertising, but about rating companies going after certain platforms without merit, which is illegal in antitrust terms.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820850519629279561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0ADFDD2D8E399354F4717FCDFD855A14CF7FDBAA5B8244B00C6AC2CD2FC9B65
  • createdAtMillis - 1722964517921
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820850519629279561B0ADFDD2D8E399354F4717FCDFD855A14CF7FDBAA5B8244B00C6AC2CD2FC9B65