Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 20:06:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7118D7AE8D9F850A80A8370CB0B4617FD83D8916250CDB70B806B4DA97F8F0A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - people do understand that this is not about individual companies deciding to seize advertising, but about rating companies going after certain platforms without merit, which is illegal in antitrust terms.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820850519629279561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7118D7AE8D9F850A80A8370CB0B4617FD83D8916250CDB70B806B4DA97F8F0A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1722974778900
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18208505196292795617118D7AE8D9F850A80A8370CB0B4617FD83D8916250CDB70B806B4DA97F8F0A0