Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 18:25:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B06EDF91238E6F304276984F034EFBAA7A3F18A24B848A0D86425FAE9662A85
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - people do understand that this is not about individual companies deciding to seize advertising, but about rating companies going after certain platforms without merit, which is illegal in antitrust terms.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820850519629279561
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B06EDF91238E6F304276984F034EFBAA7A3F18A24B848A0D86425FAE9662A85
  • createdAtMillis - 1722968759477
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18208505196292795615B06EDF91238E6F304276984F034EFBAA7A3F18A24B848A0D86425FAE9662A85