Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 23:28:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 17C7F4652D6E1414D69FEFC1C75D17B8048CD66A4E9F5A3BBC23EE5E5686056B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Necessita sim de nota pois o post não trata de opinião pessoal e sim um erro factual distorcendo a fala do programa, isso se chama calúnia e difamação e é considerado crime além de violar as regras do Twitter. https://www.tjdft.jus.br/institucional/imprensa/campanhas-e-produtos/direito-facil/edicao-semanal/dos-crimes-contra-a-honra

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820843826568708440
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 17C7F4652D6E1414D69FEFC1C75D17B8048CD66A4E9F5A3BBC23EE5E5686056B
  • createdAtMillis - 1722986884648
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182084382656870844017C7F4652D6E1414D69FEFC1C75D17B8048CD66A4E9F5A3BBC23EE5E5686056B