Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 19:06:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3014C0B1A58FEBB11A7953891C7C0E60278F73BECCC30885A389D7C63497856F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Factually correct claim, it’s still a recall. The OP accurately reported the news, his post shouldn’t be demonetized for that Not to mention, the proposed CN uses a Tesla publication as their source, which is debatably an unreliable source given the potential for bias

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820834030532837570
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3014C0B1A58FEBB11A7953891C7C0E60278F73BECCC30885A389D7C63497856F
  • createdAtMillis - 1722971163866
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18208340305328375703014C0B1A58FEBB11A7953891C7C0E60278F73BECCC30885A389D7C63497856F