Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 12:15:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF7BE8C9B9536147E161FBBC4498DBC7640799456BB46694EDCEDF970FC60EB1
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note that says the arrest is lawful, and, therefore, correct, is an opinion, since the study of Law shows other valid theories other than pure legal positivism (e.g., laws, principles, tradition etc). It is a valid one, but not in absolute terms DWORKIN; ALEXY https://legalresearchandanalysis.com/ronald-dworkins-criticism-of-positivist-theory-of-law/#:~:text=Ronald%20Dworkin's%20Criticism%20on%20Legal,covers%20the%20dispute%20before%20them. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-legal-positivism/alexys-critique-of-legal-positivism/F8A2B94FF420FE4875F6136B033F3414#:~:text=Summary,separation%20thesis%20is%20thus%20false.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820795135153574363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF7BE8C9B9536147E161FBBC4498DBC7640799456BB46694EDCEDF970FC60EB1
  • createdAtMillis - 1722946551835
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820795135153574363BF7BE8C9B9536147E161FBBC4498DBC7640799456BB46694EDCEDF970FC60EB1