Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 12:21:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E0DEC81E7EA2DEBBC9161CB18E369AD070E402617B79A866FE658965EE05CDF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note that says the arrest is lawful, and, therefore, correct, is an opinion, since the study of Law shows other valid theories other than pure legal positivism (e.g., laws, principles, tradition etc). It is a valid one, but not in absolute terms DWORKIN; ALEXY https://legalresearchandanalysis.com/ronald-dworkins-criticism-of-positivist-theory-of-law/#:~:text=Ronald%20Dworkin's%20Criticism%20on%20Legal,covers%20the%20dispute%20before%20them. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-legal-positivism/alexys-critique-of-legal-positivism/F8A2B94FF420FE4875F6136B033F3414#:~:text=Summary,separation%20thesis%20is%20thus%20false.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820795135153574363
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E0DEC81E7EA2DEBBC9161CB18E369AD070E402617B79A866FE658965EE05CDF
  • createdAtMillis - 1722946870695
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18207951351535743638E0DEC81E7EA2DEBBC9161CB18E369AD070E402617B79A866FE658965EE05CDF