Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-06 14:15:47 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6D4C7EC75C131B244F464663940C049DD587E09FE0C16188AD47A7386C14C9B3
Participant Details
Original Note:
The note that says the arrest is lawful, and, therefore, correct, is an opinion, since the study of Law shows other valid theories other than pure legal positivism (e.g., laws, principles, tradition etc). It is a valid one, but not in absolute terms DWORKIN; ALEXY https://legalresearchandanalysis.com/ronald-dworkins-criticism-of-positivist-theory-of-law/#:~:text=Ronald%20Dworkin's%20Criticism%20on%20Legal,covers%20the%20dispute%20before%20them. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-legal-positivism/alexys-critique-of-legal-positivism/F8A2B94FF420FE4875F6136B033F3414#:~:text=Summary,separation%20thesis%20is%20thus%20false.
All Note Details