Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-07 23:52:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 69C5B2F85CA0538EF0BB88D8A4D1542D8ED8D30BDF9DABCC42E64D8CB7786E95
Participant Details
Original Note:
The note that says the arrest is lawful, and, therefore, correct, is an opinion, since the study of Law shows other valid theories other than pure legal positivism (e.g., laws, principles, tradition etc). It is a valid one, but not in absolute terms DWORKIN; ALEXY https://legalresearchandanalysis.com/ronald-dworkins-criticism-of-positivist-theory-of-law/#:~:text=Ronald%20Dworkin's%20Criticism%20on%20Legal,covers%20the%20dispute%20before%20them. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-companion-to-legal-positivism/alexys-critique-of-legal-positivism/F8A2B94FF420FE4875F6136B033F3414#:~:text=Summary,separation%20thesis%20is%20thus%20false.
All Note Details