Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 11:20:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0095B583558C187F835A4332EE8C7248CFA386652C887AC7DE23BD18948CE5C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community note mentions an apparent 2% error in math about native born vs. immigrant population in the first chart, but entirely ignores ethnicity (which is the chart's central claim). The data linked therefore do not disprove the original post. https://statistics.ukdataservice.ac.uk/dataset/census-1971-data/resource/6fe0b95a-4192-48cc-b385-f2e2d9d7d31e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820645239910273516
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0095B583558C187F835A4332EE8C7248CFA386652C887AC7DE23BD18948CE5C
  • createdAtMillis - 1722943245962
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820645239910273516F0095B583558C187F835A4332EE8C7248CFA386652C887AC7DE23BD18948CE5C