Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 06:26:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 72165726C08C3303436B61A860EF573ECDEDC80BD68DA13D3716965499823EA6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Community note mentions an apparent 2% error in math about native born vs. immigrant population in the first chart, but entirely ignores ethnicity (which is the chart's central claim). The data linked therefore do not disprove the original post. https://statistics.ukdataservice.ac.uk/dataset/census-1971-data/resource/6fe0b95a-4192-48cc-b385-f2e2d9d7d31e

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820645239910273516
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 72165726C08C3303436B61A860EF573ECDEDC80BD68DA13D3716965499823EA6
  • createdAtMillis - 1722925571672
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182064523991027351672165726C08C3303436B61A860EF573ECDEDC80BD68DA13D3716965499823EA6