Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 01:05:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2D8FD2F14A2D9B742D75EF2A4717481AD8DAE5A59F90B0539AB876E85D9A1F67
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- A Rolex could be considered an in kind contribution. OP saying it was possible violation . CN tries to disprove this by saying it isn't money, but FEC still has rules on other items given of monetary value.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820626490276590027
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2D8FD2F14A2D9B742D75EF2A4717481AD8DAE5A59F90B0539AB876E85D9A1F67
  • createdAtMillis - 1722906342388
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18206264902765900272D8FD2F14A2D9B742D75EF2A4717481AD8DAE5A59F90B0539AB876E85D9A1F67