Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-05 20:25:41 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F60C3414D5669983B70B9EBF234A2BE08390E954A58615693F19B5F974BD3315
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN. 1. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence 2. It is not possible to prove he did or didn’t. 3. CN’s article even states he did and they weren’t keeping it. 4. CN’s should only be used when OP posts a factually incorrect claim that can be proven otherwise. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13703933/Kamala-Harris-Doug-Emhoff-cheated-nanny-Najen-Nayler.html
All Note Details