Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-05 21:39:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: D28F65139E0BE61535A129E12F2460A2C00A086DF1598D20C10411149848EA0C
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN. 1. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence 2. It is not possible to prove he did or didn’t. 3. CN’s article even states he did and they weren’t keeping it. 4. CN’s should only be used when OP posts a factually incorrect claim that can be proven otherwise. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13703933/Kamala-Harris-Doug-Emhoff-cheated-nanny-Najen-Nayler.html
All Note Details