Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-07 16:27:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DDD2A66608AE9161AE38069F7F21814F99A8EDC8F6B6BCD2F06002ABA09CC96
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence 2. It is not possible to prove he did or didn’t. 3. CN’s article even states he did and they weren’t keeping it. 4. CN’s should only be used when OP posts a factually incorrect claim that can be proven otherwise. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13703933/Kamala-Harris-Doug-Emhoff-cheated-nanny-Najen-Nayler.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820546368957763938
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DDD2A66608AE9161AE38069F7F21814F99A8EDC8F6B6BCD2F06002ABA09CC96
  • createdAtMillis - 1723048025782
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18205463689577639387DDD2A66608AE9161AE38069F7F21814F99A8EDC8F6B6BCD2F06002ABA09CC96