Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-06 02:37:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4FF132F5FC9B184E42DF3D5529C5344321574C7A0B24906A498ABEAE3CD32CFB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. 1. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence 2. It is not possible to prove he did or didn’t. 3. CN’s article even states he did and they weren’t keeping it. 4. CN’s should only be used when OP posts a factually incorrect claim that can be proven otherwise. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13703933/Kamala-Harris-Doug-Emhoff-cheated-nanny-Najen-Nayler.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820546368957763938
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4FF132F5FC9B184E42DF3D5529C5344321574C7A0B24906A498ABEAE3CD32CFB
  • createdAtMillis - 1722911865418
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18205463689577639384FF132F5FC9B184E42DF3D5529C5344321574C7A0B24906A498ABEAE3CD32CFB