Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-05 15:50:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D8F176836DC70F0BCAEC51E0089EEAB3D8D794DB19C50F1F639163CE22BEDBA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the IBA is disgraced and unreliable. Nothing they publish can be taken at face value. Besides they don’t decide who is and isn’t a women. If you want to argue the gender of a person do that in the comments. AP isn’t misleading people

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820484162567995398
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D8F176836DC70F0BCAEC51E0089EEAB3D8D794DB19C50F1F639163CE22BEDBA
  • createdAtMillis - 1722873040982
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18204841625679953985D8F176836DC70F0BCAEC51E0089EEAB3D8D794DB19C50F1F639163CE22BEDBA