Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-05 20:42:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4D3E699D4AF2F51E6A126EB0E90317D7C1D8EFF09A17EC12CA4FCAA05B2ED79
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed CN literally references a reply to the OP which confirms that all but the first statements are factually correct, but instead of correcting the incorrect, claim the CN author continues stating their own opinion. https://x.com/theaceofspaeder/status/1820312445874995490

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820361600814952818
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4D3E699D4AF2F51E6A126EB0E90317D7C1D8EFF09A17EC12CA4FCAA05B2ED79
  • createdAtMillis - 1722890537237
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820361600814952818D4D3E699D4AF2F51E6A126EB0E90317D7C1D8EFF09A17EC12CA4FCAA05B2ED79