Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-05 07:37:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0BAD59EA672737A5E189771C37146B2CCDC58781F7A37BB9A8C4FFF406B7720
Participant Details

Original Note:

Discrepancies have not been adequately addressed. SoS investigators misrepresent the case, claim that there is no issue as there are paper ballots that would prove there is no issue. Verifiable evidence provided that duplicate ballots were included in count of votes. https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SEB-2023-025-Fulton-2020-Vote-Count-Failures.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1820291997292278041
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C0BAD59EA672737A5E189771C37146B2CCDC58781F7A37BB9A8C4FFF406B7720
createdAtMillis - 1722843465108
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1820291997292278041C0BAD59EA672737A5E189771C37146B2CCDC58781F7A37BB9A8C4FFF406B7720