Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-05 11:31:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B637D6FD4065D4A9E208BBAABEB2EABBDB5D1ECF27D73541E0E36C7FE9F0D0E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Discrepancies have not been adequately addressed. SoS investigators misrepresent the case, claim that there is no issue as there are paper ballots that would prove there is no issue. Verifiable evidence provided that duplicate ballots were included in count of votes. https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/SEB-2023-025-Fulton-2020-Vote-Count-Failures.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1820291997292278041
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4B637D6FD4065D4A9E208BBAABEB2EABBDB5D1ECF27D73541E0E36C7FE9F0D0E
createdAtMillis - 1722857495741
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18202919972922780414B637D6FD4065D4A9E208BBAABEB2EABBDB5D1ECF27D73541E0E36C7FE9F0D0E