Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-05 03:10:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 622DB903217214CEC2DA0F58CED0F2FAB1CBFC0DFFA48A5421416CCA294312EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note is wrong according to current Supreme Court interpretation of the constitution. The earlier assault weapon ban was never ruled unconstitutional.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820267600493850628
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 622DB903217214CEC2DA0F58CED0F2FAB1CBFC0DFFA48A5421416CCA294312EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1722827459525
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1820267600493850628622DB903217214CEC2DA0F58CED0F2FAB1CBFC0DFFA48A5421416CCA294312EC