Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-05 00:48:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36323531C68FB0CCF12D0B568A7ADDB599C247253E95D99EF0B4B963E270BE7D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. That no other source verifies a claim does not make that claim wrong. Otherwise, the first to report anything would receive a CN. If no other public information supports the Tweet, someone should say so in the comments. But there is nothing showing that the Tweet is wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820258648934764701
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36323531C68FB0CCF12D0B568A7ADDB599C247253E95D99EF0B4B963E270BE7D
  • createdAtMillis - 1722818901850
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 182025864893476470136323531C68FB0CCF12D0B568A7ADDB599C247253E95D99EF0B4B963E270BE7D