Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-04 16:14:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 77616C6CC477BA969ECE61612C548C473698549DC954E502412DD2F8B0CF375E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Rancourt a déjà publié un papier identique qui a été réfuté. Aucun de ses papiers ne passent l'épreuve des "pairs", c'est à dire la critique par d'autres scientifiques. Rancourt est physicien et n'a aucune connaissance spécifique en virologie, médecine ou vaccination: https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/2040216/vaccins-covid-morts-deces-denis-rancourt-alex-jones-tucker-carlson-pandemie

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1820125757848404025
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 77616C6CC477BA969ECE61612C548C473698549DC954E502412DD2F8B0CF375E
createdAtMillis - 1722788072347
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 182012575784840402577616C6CC477BA969ECE61612C548C473698549DC954E502412DD2F8B0CF375E