Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-09 21:21:55 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C57C29E2636B6EEC260C331C6DEC4C094E097FD6078276F3ECBED9C3ACE7BAA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nick Lowles himself has now stated he is unsure of the veracity of his original tweet and has retracted. However he has left the original tweet up instead of deleting. https://x.com/lowles_nick/status/1819974924842275237?t=Q1sRGGvSUG2JZv_3jSkFCg&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1820024654561522092
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C57C29E2636B6EEC260C331C6DEC4C094E097FD6078276F3ECBED9C3ACE7BAA
  • createdAtMillis - 1723238515844
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18200246545615220924C57C29E2636B6EEC260C331C6DEC4C094E097FD6078276F3ECBED9C3ACE7BAA