Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-04 03:04:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 949FB811EE413CA4F0A6B40D870CA20434E1B7C65C52F2F5DF3B3FD8659A084D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Im Post wird beklagt, dass Journalisten die Akkreditierung entzogen wurde. Über das Geschlecht von Khalif wird keine eigene Aussage gemacht. Wenn den Journalisten tatsächlich die Akkreditierung entzogen wurde, braucht es keine CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819908761298903142
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 949FB811EE413CA4F0A6B40D870CA20434E1B7C65C52F2F5DF3B3FD8659A084D
  • createdAtMillis - 1722740644344
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819908761298903142949FB811EE413CA4F0A6B40D870CA20434E1B7C65C52F2F5DF3B3FD8659A084D