Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-04 12:32:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 13B43522AA9B431599DA60AB05F6D33614C86706D1AD84DB720C74F043A7947E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - Stop claiming that it is wrong to say this boxer is a man. Read what the science and the specialists say. In these rare cases, even if the genitalia is female, XY = genetically male. Also, OP can claim the XY method is in their view the valid way to determine categories. https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1819855670721843246
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 13B43522AA9B431599DA60AB05F6D33614C86706D1AD84DB720C74F043A7947E
createdAtMillis - 1722774738390
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 181985567072184324613B43522AA9B431599DA60AB05F6D33614C86706D1AD84DB720C74F043A7947E