Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-04 14:46:24 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DC0A8731F3DC52B3D7BCE5A0E8D700189849332320BA8ECB1031F66688E3371F
Participant Details

Original Note:

El argumento principal del tweet es que, cuando era publica, Chilectra nunca dejó 4 días sin luz a sus usuarios. La nota propuesta no desmiente esa afirmación, solo aporta datos irrelevantes sobre la historia de la compañía. Por tanto, la nota propuesta debe ser descartada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819761782547980764
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DC0A8731F3DC52B3D7BCE5A0E8D700189849332320BA8ECB1031F66688E3371F
  • createdAtMillis - 1722782784734
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819761782547980764DC0A8731F3DC52B3D7BCE5A0E8D700189849332320BA8ECB1031F66688E3371F