Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 16:56:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2769B56422E5E4AE5C6F0E8014FF9D544F92B4C2FBD037341F27C3D2FAD6E644
Participant Details

Original Note:

El argumento principal del tweet es que, cuando era publica, Chilectra nunca dejó 4 días sin luz a sus usuarios. La nota propuesta no desmiente esa afirmación, solo aporta datos irrelevantes sobre la historia de la compañía. Por tanto, la nota propuesta debe ser descartada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819761782547980764
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2769B56422E5E4AE5C6F0E8014FF9D544F92B4C2FBD037341F27C3D2FAD6E644
  • createdAtMillis - 1722704168046
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18197617825479807642769B56422E5E4AE5C6F0E8014FF9D544F92B4C2FBD037341F27C3D2FAD6E644