Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-04 21:31:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15C06E5353AD9486E3C1187ADEC93388A083ED9135414BE1F59A8DEF1AEF7595
Participant Details

Original Note:

El argumento principal del tweet es que, cuando era publica, Chilectra nunca dejó 4 días sin luz a sus usuarios. La nota propuesta no desmiente esa afirmación, solo aporta datos irrelevantes sobre la historia de la compañía. Por tanto, la nota propuesta debe ser descartada.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819761782547980764
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15C06E5353AD9486E3C1187ADEC93388A083ED9135414BE1F59A8DEF1AEF7595
  • createdAtMillis - 1722807110123
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181976178254798076415C06E5353AD9486E3C1187ADEC93388A083ED9135414BE1F59A8DEF1AEF7595