Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 16:33:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8C744335CD8C12EB6C231A50206D3E411BF18B61117C2E3F1358AFB42BCB9EF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The post is vague and it seems like a commentary on the conditions of the debate he agreed to. "... neutral setting that he previously agreed to." It doesn't say he is pulling out of any debate, simply that he refuses to debate in the precious setting.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819732813177926063
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8C744335CD8C12EB6C231A50206D3E411BF18B61117C2E3F1358AFB42BCB9EF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1722702789503
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18197328131779260638C744335CD8C12EB6C231A50206D3E411BF18B61117C2E3F1358AFB42BCB9EF6