Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 14:16:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 166A58D92D60A53D61E938B4587DB31D50CB8C4C3B45A2317A405D7E0C65DE4F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The post is vague and it seems like a commentary on the conditions of the debate he agreed to. "... neutral setting that he previously agreed to." It doesn't say he is pulling out of any debate, simply that he refuses to debate in the precious setting.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819732813177926063
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 166A58D92D60A53D61E938B4587DB31D50CB8C4C3B45A2317A405D7E0C65DE4F
  • createdAtMillis - 1722694611620
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819732813177926063166A58D92D60A53D61E938B4587DB31D50CB8C4C3B45A2317A405D7E0C65DE4F