Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-01-19 13:05:47 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: FF78F603EF4B1B58D481C10F587E3C6BBDD4AE0D00BECB696392A9DF3F7DBC28
Participant Details
Original Note:
Stating that the evidence is "wholly inadequate" relies on acceptance of the Cass Report, from which this quote is taken. The Cass Report is controversial and should not be taken as settled science: https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/Public%20Policies/2024/17.05.24%20Response%20Cass%20Review%20FINAL%20with%20ed%20note.pdf?_t=1716075965 https://osf.io/preprints/osf/uhndk https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf https://www.bma.org.uk/bma-media-centre/bma-to-undertake-an-evaluation-of-the-cass-review-on-gender-identity-services-for-children-and-young-people https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q1189/rr-2 https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details