Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-03 15:24:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BC3676826D28568348593F9E248D998EFC9869E9A25FDC7CD4E0E57AC976E189
Participant Details
Original Note:
Stating that the evidence is "wholly inadequate" relies on acceptance of the Cass Report, from which this quote is taken. The Cass Report is controversial and should not be taken as settled science: https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/Public%20Policies/2024/17.05.24%20Response%20Cass%20Review%20FINAL%20with%20ed%20note.pdf?_t=1716075965 https://osf.io/preprints/osf/uhndk https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf https://www.bma.org.uk/bma-media-centre/bma-to-undertake-an-evaluation-of-the-cass-review-on-gender-identity-services-for-children-and-young-people https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q1189/rr-2 https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details