Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-03 15:52:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: A630A80282E531F6D87DD0B9CE683E4788FF0A9E6C722089D0A3E28156B43216
Participant Details
Original Note:
Stating that the evidence is "wholly inadequate" relies on acceptance of the Cass Report, from which this quote is taken. The Cass Report is controversial and should not be taken as settled science: https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/Public%20Policies/2024/17.05.24%20Response%20Cass%20Review%20FINAL%20with%20ed%20note.pdf?_t=1716075965 https://osf.io/preprints/osf/uhndk https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf https://www.bma.org.uk/bma-media-centre/bma-to-undertake-an-evaluation-of-the-cass-review-on-gender-identity-services-for-children-and-young-people https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q1189/rr-2 https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details