Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-04 17:20:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 8FECC9AC01CC0BE85A6CB26725E1B6EBC9E1CB074E1E5B1D369CC5865A26AADC
Participant Details
Original Note:
Stating that the evidence is "wholly inadequate" relies on acceptance of the Cass Report, from which this quote is taken. The Cass Report is controversial and should not be taken as settled science: https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/Public%20Policies/2024/17.05.24%20Response%20Cass%20Review%20FINAL%20with%20ed%20note.pdf?_t=1716075965 https://osf.io/preprints/osf/uhndk https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf https://www.bma.org.uk/bma-media-centre/bma-to-undertake-an-evaluation-of-the-cass-review-on-gender-identity-services-for-children-and-young-people https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q1189/rr-2 https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details