Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-08-11 08:56:31 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3D3A5AC1930D5CDC80BE1A5C20642A8F53D3E1283B11180931E40D9FCFDC246B
Participant Details
Original Note:
Stating that the evidence is "wholly inadequate" relies on acceptance of the Cass Report, from which this quote is taken. The Cass Report is controversial and should not be taken as settled science: https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/Public%20Policies/2024/17.05.24%20Response%20Cass%20Review%20FINAL%20with%20ed%20note.pdf?_t=1716075965 https://osf.io/preprints/osf/uhndk https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf https://www.bma.org.uk/bma-media-centre/bma-to-undertake-an-evaluation-of-the-cass-review-on-gender-identity-services-for-children-and-young-people https://www.bmj.com/content/385/bmj.q1189/rr-2 https://ruthpearce.net/2024/04/16/whats-wrong-with-the-cass-review-a-round-up-of-commentary-and-evidence/
All Note Details