Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 12:27:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 99D2930192112197D546BBC36BB0443D82F86DD43089BAF7BDDA28AE0FEDB1EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The boxer in question is not a ‘c!s woman’ but is a biological male (albeit one who was incorrectly assigned female at birth due to ambiguous genitals) https://x.com/iocmedia/status/1819667573698445793?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819687758752854211
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 99D2930192112197D546BBC36BB0443D82F86DD43089BAF7BDDA28AE0FEDB1EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1722688050189
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 181968775875285421199D2930192112197D546BBC36BB0443D82F86DD43089BAF7BDDA28AE0FEDB1EE