Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 18:36:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F4954F8D0114B984A1944521AC81FCD8C89F05A8CCC311303710FF710E64C0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The boxer in question is not a ‘c!s woman’ but is a biological male (albeit one who was incorrectly assigned female at birth due to ambiguous genitals) https://x.com/iocmedia/status/1819667573698445793?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819687758752854211
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F4954F8D0114B984A1944521AC81FCD8C89F05A8CCC311303710FF710E64C0
  • createdAtMillis - 1722710201503
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 181968775875285421100F4954F8D0114B984A1944521AC81FCD8C89F05A8CCC311303710FF710E64C0