Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 11:18:20 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F9AAB20EEE4789F5E7096224E420835B918DE553B948684E4EBD196E52941091
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN c’est a IBA de prouver le “XY” pas a la boxeuse. l’IBA refuse de dévoiler le type de test effectué pour l’exclure. c est comme si un juge decide de vous mettre en prison sans dévoiler votre crime. il faut revoir les notions de logique de base.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819682662044311639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F9AAB20EEE4789F5E7096224E420835B918DE553B948684E4EBD196E52941091
  • createdAtMillis - 1722683900035
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819682662044311639F9AAB20EEE4789F5E7096224E420835B918DE553B948684E4EBD196E52941091