Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 15:46:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F683C1D57D77CC0A08D079D239887CA56D8B39FF28F77ED58D85972D39F8720A
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN c’est a IBA de prouver le “XY” pas a la boxeuse. l’IBA refuse de dévoiler le type de test effectué pour l’exclure. c est comme si un juge decide de vous mettre en prison sans dévoiler votre crime. il faut revoir les notions de logique de base.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819682662044311639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F683C1D57D77CC0A08D079D239887CA56D8B39FF28F77ED58D85972D39F8720A
  • createdAtMillis - 1722699975377
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819682662044311639F683C1D57D77CC0A08D079D239887CA56D8B39FF28F77ED58D85972D39F8720A