Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 10:34:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 872425C23BF12D10DE4C8D1755B8673C6CC99DA81EAE9E133C6224E0B93B5721
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN c’est a IBA de prouver le “XY” pas a la boxeuse. l’IBA refuse de dévoiler le type de test effectué pour l’exclure. c est comme si un juge decide de vous mettre en prison sans dévoiler votre crime. il faut revoir les notions de logique de base.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819682662044311639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 872425C23BF12D10DE4C8D1755B8673C6CC99DA81EAE9E133C6224E0B93B5721
  • createdAtMillis - 1722681289280
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819682662044311639872425C23BF12D10DE4C8D1755B8673C6CC99DA81EAE9E133C6224E0B93B5721