Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 15:58:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B7744E7155102E529EB92433F726EF1B156F23770E698CE35F941FD8CDA4053
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN c’est a IBA de prouver le “XY” pas a la boxeuse. l’IBA refuse de dévoiler le type de test effectué pour l’exclure. c est comme si un juge decide de vous mettre en prison sans dévoiler votre crime. il faut revoir les notions de logique de base.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819682662044311639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4B7744E7155102E529EB92433F726EF1B156F23770E698CE35F941FD8CDA4053
  • createdAtMillis - 1722700709991
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18196826620443116394B7744E7155102E529EB92433F726EF1B156F23770E698CE35F941FD8CDA4053