Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 10:40:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3886A83EB056C20296B379E21EEAF934A4AE7D0316A8F95011234C3319C8D9C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN c’est a IBA de prouver le “XY” pas a la boxeuse. l’IBA refuse de dévoiler le type de test effectué pour l’exclure. c est comme si un juge decide de vous mettre en prison sans dévoiler votre crime. il faut revoir les notions de logique de base.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819682662044311639
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3886A83EB056C20296B379E21EEAF934A4AE7D0316A8F95011234C3319C8D9C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1722681624493
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18196826620443116393886A83EB056C20296B379E21EEAF934A4AE7D0316A8F95011234C3319C8D9C5