Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 10:18:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F48262DADD40860EDFE7F187D71B616B234CCFCF41184DEF83B81CBFECCC7D47
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note de contexte : Le Daily Mail n'est pas une source fiable, il s'agit d'un tabloïd connu pour son sensationnalisme, son manque de vérification des informations et la publication de nouvelles fausses ou volontairement polémiques. https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/02/09/le-daily-mail-n-est-plus-une-source-utilisable-sur-wikipedia_5077027_4408996.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819519968217591945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F48262DADD40860EDFE7F187D71B616B234CCFCF41184DEF83B81CBFECCC7D47
  • createdAtMillis - 1722680310870
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819519968217591945F48262DADD40860EDFE7F187D71B616B234CCFCF41184DEF83B81CBFECCC7D47