Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 13:05:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F06ED5DEE1A79D85FAE2FDF3E7BA219B218E6CCD9981C9AF0C8420430B57482F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note de contexte : Le Daily Mail n'est pas une source fiable, il s'agit d'un tabloïd connu pour son sensationnalisme, son manque de vérification des informations et la publication de nouvelles fausses ou volontairement polémiques. https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/02/09/le-daily-mail-n-est-plus-une-source-utilisable-sur-wikipedia_5077027_4408996.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819519968217591945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F06ED5DEE1A79D85FAE2FDF3E7BA219B218E6CCD9981C9AF0C8420430B57482F
  • createdAtMillis - 1722690322026
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819519968217591945F06ED5DEE1A79D85FAE2FDF3E7BA219B218E6CCD9981C9AF0C8420430B57482F