Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 08:34:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDC0ECA3DEFFF6BF0C7A095A6AB5A834B9986DA9A3ADA71C68E4B98000BDFE9D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note de contexte : Le Daily Mail n'est pas une source fiable, il s'agit d'un tabloïd connu pour son sensationnalisme, son manque de vérification des informations et la publication de nouvelles fausses ou volontairement polémiques. https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/02/09/le-daily-mail-n-est-plus-une-source-utilisable-sur-wikipedia_5077027_4408996.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1819519968217591945
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDC0ECA3DEFFF6BF0C7A095A6AB5A834B9986DA9A3ADA71C68E4B98000BDFE9D
  • createdAtMillis - 1722674041164
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1819519968217591945CDC0ECA3DEFFF6BF0C7A095A6AB5A834B9986DA9A3ADA71C68E4B98000BDFE9D