Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-08-03 06:23:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9BB5A547E07546836FE75633E56AE2DC7D7566FD268093E4DF926B4560C0DFBA
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note de contexte : Le Daily Mail n'est pas une source fiable, il s'agit d'un tabloïd connu pour son sensationnalisme, son manque de vérification des informations et la publication de nouvelles fausses ou volontairement polémiques. https://www.lemonde.fr/pixels/article/2017/02/09/le-daily-mail-n-est-plus-une-source-utilisable-sur-wikipedia_5077027_4408996.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1819519968217591945
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 9BB5A547E07546836FE75633E56AE2DC7D7566FD268093E4DF926B4560C0DFBA
createdAtMillis - 1722666184291
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18195199682175919459BB5A547E07546836FE75633E56AE2DC7D7566FD268093E4DF926B4560C0DFBA